Cases 21 - 30 of 204
Jackson v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv10469
Petitioner:
Reginald Allen Jackson
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Gray
as 4:2022cv10287
Petitioner:
Garret Jackson
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Gray
as 1:2022cv10287
Petitioner:
Garret Jackson
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diggs et al v Mici et al
as 4:2022cv40003
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Diggs, Demetrius Goshen, James Jacks and others
Defendant:
John Madden, James Gearin, Charles Primack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sharp et al
as 1:2021cv11276
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Frederick L. Sharp, Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch, Courtney Kelln and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Weber et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11043
Plaintiff:
Joy Weber and Eugene Weber
Defendant:
James Jackson, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Burelle v. Jackson Lumber and Millwork Co., Inc.
as 1:2021cv11038
Plaintiff:
Robert David Burelle
Defendant:
Jackson Lumber and Millwork Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2021cv10798
Plaintiff:
David R. Jackson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Roycroft et al
as 1:2021cv10738
Defendant:
Town of Barnstable, Spencer Jackson and Sean Roycroft
Plaintiff:
Ian Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
