Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primus v. Fry
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Carron Lee Primus
Defendant:
Mr Fry and Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primus v. Frye
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Carron Lee Primus
Defendant:
C.O. Unknown Frye and Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Knox et al
as 2:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Markey Walker
Defendant:
Lt. Knox, Officer Hill and Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denney v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Donald Lawrence Denney
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail and Well Path - Jail Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diego Garcia v. Jackson County Jail, et al
as 23-2707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Diego I. Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
Jackson County Jail and Lieutenant Hieu To, Corrections Officer, Jackson County Jail
Rice v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv02369
Plaintiff:
Larry Rice
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Officer Fry and C/O O'Neil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cockrell v. Gaddis et al
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jason Erie Cockrell and Jason Eric Cockrell
Defendant:
Cpl Gaddis and Jackson County Jail Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BORDERS v. JACKSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
FATIMAH BORDERS
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY JAIL, ALL AND ANY PARTICIPANT OFFICERS and EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Jackson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Love
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Jackson County Jail and Piedmont Judicial Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
