Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bozorgmehr PouyehIn re: Bozorgmehr Pouyeh
as 23-12532
Petitioner:
In re: BOZORGMEHR POUYEH
Respondent:
PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF JACKSON HEALTH SYSTEM, a.k.a. Trust, CARLOS A. MIGOYA, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, STEVEN J. GEDDE, Program Director of Opthamology Residency Program and others
Gomez v. Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, FL
as 1:2023cv22034
Defendant:
PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL doing business as JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL also known as JACKSON HEALTH SYSTEM and JACKSON HEALTH SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Julio Garcia v. Ashley Moody, et al
as 22-14155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO JUAN GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY MOODY, MIAMI-DADE CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, EGINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Garcia v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2022cv22377
Plaintiff:
Julio Juan Garcia
Defendant:
Attorney General, Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehab Department, O Egins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Santiago et al
as 1:2022cv22105
Plaintiff:
Kristian J. Hall
Defendant:
Edward Santiago, Dana Robin Goldman, Daniel Junior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
