Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Robert et al
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Kendall Jamal Washington
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Captain Lisa Worley and Officer Dennis Orlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockheed Martin Corporation Salaried Savings Plan v. Hicks-Haynie
as 1:2023cv01105
Counter Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation Salaried Savings Plan
Defendant:
Elizabeth Danielle Hicks-Hayne, Elizabeth Danielle Hicks-Haynie, Dorothy A. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Smith v. Sanford et al
as 1:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Smith
Defendant:
Nurse Kasey Sanford, Captain Richard Mitcham, Nurse Tracey Thrower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balentine v. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Todd Watson, Rob Ratten and Randall Rudisill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balentine v. Watson et al
as 5:2022cv05008
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Attorney Todd Watson, Judge Rob Ratten and Deputy Prosecutor Randall Rudisill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balentine et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Nicci Carter, Audrey Huddleston and Nini Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balentine et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2021cv05229
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Nurse Audrey Huddleston, Nicci Carter and Nini Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Daniels et al
as 2:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brent Terrell Martin, Sr
Defendant:
Bennie Daniels, Lionell Moss and Jamal Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akram v. Payne
as 4:2020cv01015
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
James D Akram and Jamal D Akram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
