Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Rehman v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65267
Plaintiff:
Jamal Rehman
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salame v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02638
Plaintiff:
Jamal Salame
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bey v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Bey
Defendant:
Chaplain Blaire Smith and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayesha NH et al v. Hussain NH et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Defendant:
Irfan, Ghazala, Ahmed Hussain NH and others
Plaintiff:
Noor Ayesha NH, R/a and Queen's Girls pg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dye v. Erdos
as 1:2022cv00848
Petitioner:
Jamal Dye
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00845
Petitioner:
Jamal Dye
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendricks v. USA
as 1:2021cv01605
Petitioner:
Erick Jamal Hendricks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Boiler Seafood SE, LLC
as 1:2021cv01144
Defendant:
Boiler Seafood Se, LLC doing business as Boiler 65
Plaintiff:
Jamal Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
