Cases 1 - 10 of 34,791
Barrow v. Hydrick et al
as 1:2024cv01975
Plaintiff:
John Barrow
Defendant:
Stacey Hydrick, James Balli and Warren Selby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. PAYNE et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN WESLEY, JR
Defendant:
S PAYNE and C WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Calisi v. Volusia County Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Calisi
Defendant:
Volusia County Department of Corrections, Mark A. Flowers, Scott DeEsposito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Santa Rosa C.I.
as 3:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Santa Rosa C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 1:2024cv01930
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Thompson v. I.M. Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
James E. Thompson
Defendant:
I.M. Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
