Cases 1 - 10 of 1,283
Noe v. Grainger County et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Glenn Noe
Defendant:
Grainger County, Grainger Co Sheriff James Harville and Cody Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Nationwide Cargo, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Nationwide Cargo, Inc. and Dustin Singhas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Catlett et al v. Norman et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Chris James Catlett and Samantha Ann Catlett
Defendant:
Norman Joe Sturgill and Kimberly Sturgill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joy v. USA
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
James J. Joy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Cunningham v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Jamie Cunningham and James Cunningham
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swann v. Barrong et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Defendant:
James Barrong and Chief Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arp v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
James Arp, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP d/b/a Wal-Mart #698
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
