Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Alfonso Pew v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW, AKA Sehu-Kessa-Saa Tabansi
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, Executive Deputy Secretary of Corrections, TABB BICKELL, Regional Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
Defendant:
DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer, KERI MOORE, Grievance Officer, DR. NOEL PALAKURC, Medical Doctor and others
Atkinson v. Lower et al
as 1:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
James Logan Atkinson
Defendant:
Jeff Lower, Tazwell County Sheriffs Dept and Tazwell County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan et al v. Marker Group, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
James Logan and Nathan Baxter
Defendant:
Marker Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LOGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55538
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES LOGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF JUSTIN SHULTS et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
as 1:2021cv02417
Plaintiff:
SHEILA SHELL, JEFFREY SHULTS, TIFFANY SHULTS-RISTINE and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Logan v. SSA
as 5:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Dakota James Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Diez v. Boyd
as 20-50961
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Logan Diez
Respondent / Appellee:
Sheriff Calvin Boyd, Burnet County
Diez v. Google
as 20-50940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Logan Diez
Defendant / Appellee:
Google, Incorporated
Diez v. Hecht et al
as 1:2020cv01096
Defendant:
Jane N. Bland, J. Brett Busby, Scott Walker and others
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diez v. Boyd
as 1:2020cv00819
Petitioner:
James Logan Diez
Respondent:
Sheriff Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
