Cases 1 - 10 of 41
James Dailey v. Fleming, et al
as 23-12048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. FLEMING, LT. SPADES and MS. BRYANT
(HC) Dailey v. State of California
as 1:2023cv00389
Petitioner:
James Edward Dailey
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAILEY v. CORRECT X PHARMACY et al
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
CORRECT X PHARMACY, Nurse GREY, Nurse JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: James Dailey
as 22-11503
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Dailey v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
James William Dailey
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAILEY v. FLEMING et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
Mr FLEMING, Lieutenant JAMES, JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Dailey et al
as 4:2020cv03625
Defendant:
Halftime Sports Bar, LLC, Jeffrey C Huynh, James Allen Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James M. DaileyIn re: James M. Dailey
as 19-15145
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES M. DAILEY
James M Dailey v. Secretary, Florida DOC, et al
as 19-15147
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES M. DAILEY
Dailey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2019cv02956
Petitioner:
James M. Dailey
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
