Cases
James DeLanis v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson, et al
as 23-5948
Plaintiff / Appellee: JAMES A. DELANIS
Defendant: METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellant: BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC
James DeLanis v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson, et al
as 23-5939
Plaintiff / Appellee: JAMES A. DELANIS
Defendant: METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT J. MENDES, in his capacity as a member of the Metro Council
DeLanis v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00469
Plaintiff: James A. DeLanis
Defendant: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Robert J. Mendes and Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walter v. Rowe et al
as 1:2013cv00045
Plaintiff: David A. Walter
Defendant: Dean Rowe , Randy Clarke , James M. Delany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv01967
Not Classified By Court: SEC, Non-Party XOS Technologies, Inc., The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Samuel Jacobson, Danny Wimprine, Craig Newsome and others
Interested Party: Timothy J McIlwain, Pac-12 Conference, James E. Delany and others
Amicus Curiae: A&E Television Networks, LLC, James Brown, First Amendment Coalition and others
Plaintiff: Michael E. Davis, Michael Anderson, Samuel Michael Keller and others
Intervenor: Ramzi Yusef, Edward Breivik, James E. Holmes and others
Petitioner: Nicholas Kindler
Defendant: Collegiate Licensing Company, National Collegiate Athletic Association and Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?