Cases
Banks v. Rappahannock Regional Jail Medical Departement et al
as 2:2009cv00562
Plaintiff: James Banks, Jr.
Defendant: Rappahannock Regional Jail Medical Departement and Henrico Co, Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florida United Brotherhood of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. McCartney & Company, Incorporated
as 6:2009cv00991
Plaintiff: Florida United Brotherhood of Carpenters Pension Fund, Roger Woonton, Stephen M. Cothron and others
Defendant: McCartney & Company, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Banks v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2008cv00020
Petitioner: Willie James Banks, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BANKS v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61091
Plaintiff: JAMES BANKS, JR., JAMES BANKS, JR., JAMES BANKS, JR. and others
Defendant: E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Banks v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2007cv00445
Petitioner: Willie James Banks, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2007cv00337
Petitioner: Willie James Banks, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Florida Carpenters Regional Council Training Trust Fund et al v. Colasanti Group, Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv13501
Plaintiff: Florida Carpenters Regional Council Training Trust Fund, Florida UBC Health Fund, Florida UBC Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Colasanti Group, Incorporated, Colasanti Construction Services, Incorporated, Colasanti Specialty Services, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?