Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barber v. The City of Miami et al
as 1:2022cv20883
Plaintiff:
Willie James Barber
Defendant:
Alexander Garcia Contrearas, CITY OF MIAMI, The City of Miami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03987
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN THOMAS, TONY CAMPBELL, JAMES HARTSON and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54970
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20680
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02488
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas, Tony Campbell, James Hartson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Barber v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04753
Plaintiff:
James Barber
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv08934
Plaintiff:
James Barber and Sheila Ann Barber
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05987
Plaintiff:
James Barber
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
