Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Burke v. Warden of FCI-Schuylkill
as 1:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Joseph James Burke
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burke v. Aghsbh Marketing & Distribution, LP
as 1:2020cv02425
Defendant:
Aghsbh Marketing & Distribution, LP doing business as Arooga's Grill House & Sports Bar
Plaintiff:
James Burke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TAYLOR et al v. TUMOLO et al
as 2:2019cv04533
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAGSDALE, VERONICA TAYLOR, JULIUS BUTLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN CAHILL, JOE GILLESPIE, CARL WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DANDAR v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
RONALD DANDAR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SCI FAYETTE PHYSICIAL MIKE HERBIK, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Intervenor_defendant:
PA DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHAMES v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04011
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RHAMES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , JOSE MEDINA , JAMES BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE et al v. BRAVE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURKE and KATHLEEN BURKE
Defendant:
BRAVE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ESKRIDGE v. BAKER et al
as 2:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
LAKENYA ESKRIDGE
Defendant:
JOHNNIE BAKER , DEBORAH BROWN , ARLENE HELEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BURKE et al v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67717
Plaintiff:
DONNA BURKE , JAMES BURKE , DEBRA ANN BURKE-CAPONE and others
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
