Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Doyle Davis v. James Corcoran, et al
as 22-55959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES CORCORAN, Correctional Officer, J. PULIDO, Correctional Officer, R. SKOG, Correctional Officer and others
Cruz v. Swedish Covenant Health et al
as 1:2022cv05162
Plaintiff:
Jerico Matias Cruz
Defendant:
Swedish Covenant Health, Swedish Hospital, Kimberly Tranchita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Dyslin et al
as 1:2019cv05155
Defendant:
Tahseen Mohammed, Brianna Wagner, Sharon Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Jon David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dopson v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2019cv05077
Defendant:
Deborah Marsicol, James Corcoran, Rex Fields and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dopson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abiuso et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv12374
Plaintiff:
Dirk Delph, Erickson Christmas, Tyrone Anthony and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt
Aversano et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11785
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baione, John Kazmierczak, Robert Crook, Jr and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Acerno v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11754
Plaintiff:
Julio E Alicea, Patrice Trichon, Diana Mauceri Sibilia and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13875
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Epperson et al
as 1:2018cv03385
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Ortiz
Defendant:
Bill Epperson, Carter, Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuerstenberg v. Zaruba et al
as 1:2015cv10469
Plaintiff:
Dean Fuerstenberg
Defendant:
John E. Zaruba and James Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
