Cases 1 - 5 of 5
PERRY et al v. AIG et al
as 1:2018cv15455
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE PERRY and JAMES D. PERRY, IV
Defendant:
AIG and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURG, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dr. James D. Perry v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Dr. James D. Perry
Defendant:
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and Center for Orthopaedics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co et al
as 2:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
James D Perry
Defendant:
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co and Center for Orthopaedics L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank Ltd et al
as 3:2009cv00298
Defendant:
Claudia Martinez, Pablo M. Alvarado, Gary D. Magness and others
Petitioner:
Katherine A Hill, Mariana DeLeon, Robert L. Ward and others
Not Classified By Court:
Juan Manuel Dupuy Rada, Frank Carpin, Stephen Barber and others
Interested Party:
Aviva Bakshy, Daniel Gomez Ferreiro, John Little and others
Intervenor:
Nancy Brownlee, James T. Hassell, Sr., Samuel G Pal and others
Claimant:
David Strauss, Sandra Strauss, Richard Gonzales and others
Respondent:
Rebecca Reeves-Stanford and Randi Stanford
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America, Walton Houston Galleria Office LP and Daniel Acund
Plaintiff:
Promotora Marino CA, Roberto Barbar, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
BDO USA, LLP and BDO USA LLP
Receiver:
Ralph S Janvey and Ralph S. Janvey
Intervenor Defendant:
Farmers & Merchants Bank
Trustee:
Lynn Turk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Perry v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2007cv00236
Plaintiff:
James D. Perry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
