Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Bell v. United States Parole Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv03568
Petitioner: James Dalton Bell
Respondent: United States Parole Commission, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00978
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. Thomas
as 1:2011cv00243
Petitioner: James Dalton Bell
Respondent: Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010mc05031
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: James Dalton Bell
Garnishee: Templeton Emerging Market Funds
USA v. James Bell
as 10-30216
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DALTON BELL
James Bell v. USA
as 10-71593
Petitioner: JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bell v. US Courts et al
as 2:2010cv00604
Petitioner: James Dalton Bell
Respondent: US Courts, Federal Bureau of Prisons and All Agents of US Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Bell v. USDCTAC
as 10-70876
: In re: JAMES DALTON BELL
Petitioner: JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent: USDC, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bell v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05175
Petitioner: James Dalton Bell
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Apker et al
as 4:2009cv00216
Petitioner: James Dalton Bell
Respondent: Apker, USP Tucson and U.S. District Court
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?