Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05752
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James Dean
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
A.G. v. Everett School District et al
as 2:2017cv01409
Plaintiff:
A.G.
Defendant:
Everett School District , Cathy Woods , James Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cloud v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv03089
Petitioner:
James Dean Cloud
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2010cv00589
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, King County Jail Captains, King County Jail Sergeants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks v. Van Olst
as 2:2010cv00087
Petitioner:
James Dean Wilks
Respondent:
Kathy Van Olst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilks et al v. King County et al
as 2:2009cv01627
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Lorenzo Jones, Sergeant Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks v. Van Olst et al
as 2:2009cv00651
Defendant:
Kathy Cullen Van Olst, Dale Porter, Sergeant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2008cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Vernette Stowers, A Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilks v. Stowers et al
as 2:2007cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
Vernette Stowers, T. Hansen, Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2007cv01720
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Hansen, M Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
