Cases 1 - 10 of 30
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) et al
as 1:2018cv01583
Defendant:
PAUL J. MCNULTY, JAMES G. ROCHE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donato v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01271
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Donato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Cramer v. Oribital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01225
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cramer
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman, David W. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Simnowitz v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01181
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Simnowitz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Berg v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01169
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Roman Martinez, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Justin Sedon v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Sedon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ayzin v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01151
Defendant:
Romas Martinez, IV, Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ayzin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lickteig v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01139
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman, Roman Martinez, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lickteig
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-3599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
