Cases 41 - 50 of 53
MILLEDGE v. OWENS et al
as 5:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES MILLEDGE
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, SHARON LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES HILL
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, VICTORIA MALONE and Dawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv01490
Plaintiff:
Michael James Hill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Madison County School Board et al
as 5:2010cv02593
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Defendant:
Madison County School Board, Christopher J Cundiff, Ronnie J Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hills v. Southern Fire Protection of Orlando, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01629
Plaintiff:
James Hills and James Hills
Defendant:
Southern Fire Protection of Orlando, Inc. and Leonard Hollis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Rose v. St Clair County et al
as 2:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
James Jacob Rose, Jr
Defendant:
St Clair County, Terry Marcum, James Hill and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walden v. Decatur City Jail et al
as 5:2008cv01940
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Walden
Defendant:
Decatur City Jail, James Hill, Carla Hogue and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Robinson et al
as 8:2007cv01908
Plaintiff:
Willie James Hill
Defendant:
George Robinson, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. OA Security Services et al
as 8:2007cv01769
Plaintiff:
Carl James Hill
Defendant:
OA Security Services and J.D. O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
