Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Phillips v. Att: Tabor
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
James Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Att: Tabor and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Phillips - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Coldren
as 1:2022cv00134
Defendant:
John Coldren and John Colden Lawler
Plaintiff:
James Lee Phillips and James L Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phillips - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Coldren
as 1:2022cv00135
Defendant:
John Coldren and John Coldren Lawler
Plaintiff:
James Lee Phillips and James L Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Miami County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
James Fairchild and James Lee Fairchild
Defendant:
Miami County Jail, Clothier and Lisa Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 4:2021cv00011
Defendant:
BOB CURL, JEFF CUMBERWORTH, RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2020 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 3:2020mc00017
In Re:
Mark Arnold Werling, John Christopher Havill, Steven Stoy Crone and others
Obenchain v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Lee Obenchain, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roda v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2019cv00839
Defendant:
B Holcomb, Matt Hassel and Cpt Butts
Plaintiff:
James Lee Roda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02378
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
