Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Matthews v. RPH ON THE GO, USA
as 1:2011at00756
Plaintiff: James Matthews
Defendant: RPH ON THE GO, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greenfield v. Attorney General of the State of Oregon
as 6:2011cv06295
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Oregon
Petitioner: James Matthew Greenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dr. Greens, Inc. v. Stephens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00638
Plaintiff: Dr. Greens, Inc.
Defendant: James Matthew Stephens and Spectrum Laboratories, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Righthaven LLC v. Matthews et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01763
Defendant: James Matthews and Muscle Cars of America
Plaintiff: Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sharon Y Sosa et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
as 5:2010cv01098
Plaintiff: Ankur Baishya, Irina Barbarov, Natalie Daliah Barrantes and others
Defendant: Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Alexandra Haffner v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv04698
Defendant: Chief William J. Bratton, City of Los Angeles, DOES and others
Plaintiff: Alexandra Haffner
Green et al v. Stephens et al
as 3:2009cv01673
Plaintiff: Matthew Green and Dr. Greens, Inc.
Defendant: James Matthew Stephens and Laboratories Spectrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Delmavic Manabat et al v. Hillary Clinton et al
as 2:2009cv05288
Plaintiff: Delmavic Manabat, Joshua Moses Manicat, James Matthew Manicat and others
Defendant: Hillary Clinton, Janice L. Jacobs, William W. Lesh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Armstrong v. Asselin et al
as 3:2007cv00243
Plaintiff: Jared Armstrong
Defendant: Gerard Asselin, Kevin Vandegriff, Dawn Neer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?