Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dayson #213123 v. MacLaren
as 2:2014cv00065
Petitioner:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Respondent:
Duncan MacLaren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dayson #213123 v. McMichael et al
as 1:2012cv01304
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Todd McMichael, Frank Machnik, Tat Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayson #213123 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Catherine Bauman, Mary Berghuis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayson #213123 et al v. Access et al
as 2:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Access, Union Supply Direct, Jack L. Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayson #213123 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dan Bolden and Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayson #213123 v. Kleine et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Robert J. Kleine, Patricia Caruso and Michael Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayson #213123 v. Cass County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2012cv01307
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Cass County Board of Commissioners, Joseph Underwood and Canteen Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayson #213123 v. Cass County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Cass County Board of Commissioners, Berrien County Board of Commissioners, Van Buren County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayson #213123 v. Rondeau et al
as 1:2012cv01310
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Susan Rondeau, Patricia Caruso, Carol Howes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
