Cases 11 - 20 of 20
James Monroe Silvis III v. Board of Prison Hearings et al
as 5:2010cv01443
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings, Attorney General Edmund G Brown, Jr and H Mays
Petitioner:
James Monroe Silvis, III
Silvis v. Board of Prison Hearings et al
as 3:2010cv01882
Petitioner:
James Monroe Silvis, III
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings , H Mays and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Silvis v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2010cv01871
Petitioner:
James Monroe Silvis, III
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Monroe Silvis III v. Warden J.F. Salazar et al
as 5:2009cv01443
Petitioner:
James Monroe Silvis, III
Respondent:
J F Salazar, J F Salazar and California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Silvis v. Salazar et al
as 3:2009cv01567
Petitioner:
James Monroe Silvis, III
Respondent:
J F Salazar and California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. Hedgpeth
as 3:2008cv01812
Petitioner:
James Monroe
Respondent:
A. Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Monroe v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv02342
Plaintiff:
Robert James Monroe
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Scottsdale Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Gamble v. Maricopa County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2007cv00747
Plaintiff:
Bruce Gamble
Defendant:
Maricopa County Public Defenders Office and James Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
