Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Flowers v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv00235
Plaintiff: James Monroe Flowers, Jr
Defendant: State of Washington, City of Seattle, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Monroe v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10767
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS JAMES MONROE
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Pollock v. Roberts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv03125
Petitioner: James Monroe Pollock
Respondent: Ray Roberts and Kansas Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Monroe v. Matthew Cate
as 11-55520
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES MONROE
Respondent - Appellee: MATTHEW CATE
Dailey v. Washington
as 1:2010cv04050
Petitioner: James Monroe Dailey
Respondent: Anthony Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Monroe v. TDCJ
as 10-11124
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS JAMES MONROE
Respondent - Appellee: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
James Monroe Silvis III v. Board of Prison Hearings et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv01443
Respondent: Board of Prison Hearings, Attorney General Edmund G Brown, Jr and H Mays
Petitioner: James Monroe Silvis, III
Silvis v. Board of Prison Hearings et al
as 3:2010cv01882
Petitioner: James Monroe Silvis, III
Respondent: Board of Prison Hearings , H Mays and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Silvis v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2010cv01871
Petitioner: James Monroe Silvis, III
Respondent: People of the State of California and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Monroe v. TDCJ
as 5:2009cv00188
Petitioner: Thomas James Monroe
Respondent: TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?