Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Aaron Pierce v. Jeannie Woodford, et al
as 09-17015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNIE S. WOODFORD, M.D. SINNA, CTF/ Soledad Doctor, M.D. ROBERTSON and others
Aaron Pierce v. Edward Alameida, Jr., et al
as 09-16868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., SCOTT KERNAN, Mule Creek State Prison Warden, DAVID RUNNELS, High Desert State Prison Warden and others
Pierce v. Alameida
as 5:2003cv04934
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Pierce
Defendant:
Robertson and Sinna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Pierce v. Edward Alameida, Jr., et al
as 09-16714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON JAMES PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., SCOTT KERNAN, Mule Creek State Prison Warden, DAVID RUNNELS, High Desert State Prison Warden and others
Pierce v. Woodford
as 5:2009cv03343
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Pierce
Defendant:
Jeanette Woodford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Martez
as 5:2008cv02678
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Pierce
Defendant:
Matthew Martez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. Alameida
as 2:2008cv01148
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Pierce
Defendant:
Edward S. Alameida, Jr., Scott Kernan, David Runnels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2008cv00228
Plaintiff:
John L. Davis, John L. Davis, William Larsen and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Viad Corp., Todd Shipyards Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at10349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
