Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Richardson v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00948
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert James Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Derrick Galvin v. Steven Rosenbaum, et al
as 19-3273
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Education, Secretary, Elizabeth C. Macdonough, U.S. Senate Official, Michael R. Pence, Vice President/President of Senate and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick S. Galvin
Galvin v. Rosenbaum et al
as 4:2019cv00615
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Deborah Leff, Kevin Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02201
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Price, Scott Roe, David Riley and others
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo, LLC, 3M Company and others
Ellis et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02099
Plaintiff:
William DeCarlo, Christopher Morgan, Scott Passmore and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Richardson v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv06148
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
James Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Andrew Richardson v. United State
as 13-2606
Petitioner - Appellant:
Andrew James Richardson
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00238
Petitioner:
Andrew James Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00228
Petitioner:
Andrew James Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
