Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Rogers et al v. GSB Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00894
Plaintiff:
James Rogers and Andrew Ditmore
Defendant:
GSB Transport, Inc. and Gurpreet Singh Bhogal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 4:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Corporate Medical Services, Inc., Dart Transit Company and Omega Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lizana v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09351
Plaintiff:
James Rogers Lizana
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Amy Hebert v. James Rogers, Warden
as 17-30191
Petitioner - Appellant:
AMY HEBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
PlainsCapital Bank v. Michael Roger
as 16-41654
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PLAINSCAPITAL BANK
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES ROGERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Robyn Davis v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-31136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBYN LITTLE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Rogers et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv13851
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Rogers , Netty Acker , Bernard Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carol Saltzman v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30839
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAROL SALTZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Sheila Hamilton v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-30494
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHEILA HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
