Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Rogers v. Hulick et al
as 1:2005cv01353
Plaintiff:
Clarence James Rogers
Defendant:
Cornealious Sanders , Ed Anderson , James Critzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Ergon Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Dennis Johnson , Floyd Williams , James Rogers and others
Defendant:
Ergon Trucking, Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. James Rogers
as 08-6181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ROGERS
Levin v. Kabat et al
as 1:2008cv00616
Plaintiff:
John Levin
Defendant:
Kevin T. Kabat, Kevin T. Kabat, Fifth Third Bancorp and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Rogers v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
as PAE/2:08-CV-69335
Plaintiff:
James Rogers
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
James Rogers v. Zurn Industries Inc
as PAE/2:08-CV-64692
Defendant:
Zurn Industries Inc
Plaintiff:
James Rogers
Coley James Rogers v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-64691
Plaintiff:
Coley James Rogers
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
Clean Venture, Inc. v. Sparrows Point Metal Recovery, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv03059
Plaintiff:
Clean Venture, Inc. and Clean Venture, Inc.
Defendant:
Sparrows Point Metal Recovery, LLC, Barletta Engineering Corporation, SPS Limited Partnership, LLLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stephens, et al v. WebAccess Intl Inc, et al
as 1:2003cv01521
Plaintiff:
Leonard Stephens, Edward Buhlman, Jim Noffsinger and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Dane Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
WebAccess International, Inc., Blair Whitaker, J. Roger Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
