Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Abughazaleh v. Branson et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Yousef Abughazaleh
Defendant:
Richard Branson, Wanda Austin, Adam Bain and others
Nominal Defendant:
Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
RYAN v. UNITED STATES SOLICITER GENERAL
as 2:2022cv04497
Plaintiff:
MR. ROBERT JAMES RYAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SOLICITER GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RYAN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
JAMES RYAN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiegand v. Garipalli et al
as 1:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
Eric Wiegand
Defendant:
Vivek Garipalli, Andrew Toy, Joseph Wagner and others
Nominal Defendant:
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
In re Clover Health Investments, Corp. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Chelsea Clinton, Vivek Garipalli, Nathaniel S. Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Furman and Eric Wiegand
Nominal Defendant:
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WIDNER v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05083
Plaintiff:
JAMES RYAN WIDNER
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GROTENHUIS et al v. E5 SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02896
Plaintiff:
KURT GROTENHUIS and PAUL MILLER
Defendant:
E5 SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC , MARK STAPLETON and GEORGE JAMES RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv02011
Plaintiff:
JAMES RYAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP., DOES 1-20, DOES 20-40 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
