Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mercy Schelmety v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2026cv01915
Plaintiff:
Mercy Schelmety
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Jim Wilbur, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHOEMAKER v. WARDEN
as 3:2025cv00030
Petitioner:
CHANNING JAMES SHOEMAKER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHOEMAKER v. WARDEN
as 3:2025cv00029
Petitioner:
CHANNING JAMES SHOEMAKER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHOEMAKER v. WARDEN
as 3:2025cv00028
Petitioner:
CHANNING JAMES SHOEMAKER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shoemaker v. AXIS Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv61933
Plaintiff:
James Shoemaker
Defendant:
AXIS Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SHOEMAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19267
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHOEMAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham et al v. Elkhart General Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
William J Graham, Willie Joe Graham, Dianna Graham and others
Defendant:
James L Shoemaker, Jr, O'Dene Hanniffe Lewis, Muhammad Ahsan Saeed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Elkhart General Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Dianna Graham
Defendant:
Elkhart General Hospital, Elkhart Clinic, Carl Risk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Elkhart General Hospital et al
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Dianna Graham
Defendant:
Elkhart General Hospital, Tim J. Chupp, Elkhart Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHOEMAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02651
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHOEMAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
