Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LOWRY et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA C. LOWRY, ANTHONY LAW, RAYMAR MCKENZIE and others
Defendant:
DENA BROWN, BENJAMIN O'LEARY, CORITHIAN FOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DEEDS
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
MIKEL DEEDS
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH et al v. WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY et al
as 2:2019cv01672
Defendant:
GLEN THOMSON, WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY, GENE KARCH and others
Plaintiff:
SALLY SMITH, JAMES SMITH, ANTOINETTE MACZKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLA CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. CITY OF MONESSEN et al
as 2:2019cv00390
Plaintiff:
BELLA CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF MONESSEN and JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART et al
as 3:2018cv00252
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART and SACERITY OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT MARSH et al
as 3:2018cv00164
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARSH, RICKEY L. SHERMAN and SECURITY OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. SCI BENNER et al
as 2:2018cv01032
Defendant:
SCI BENNER and RICKY L. SHERMAN
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. GRACIE et al
as 3:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
MATTHEW GRACIE and RAYMOND JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00044
Petitioner:
JAMES SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DA'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
