Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Washington v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2009cv00030
Petitioner:
James Washington, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Sims
as 6:2008cv00379
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Unidentified Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv01206
Plaintiff:
Albert James Washington
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rucks et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jaborie Rucks, Nicole Shuntae Russell, Mary B. Saldivar and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Washington v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00329
Petitioner:
Albert James Washington
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Standholt, et al
as 08-40028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STANDHOLT, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit, BADGETT, SKINNER and others
Southeast Supply Header, LLC v. 80 acres in Lawrence County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00252
Plaintiff:
Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC and others
Defendant:
80 acres in Lawrence County, Mississippi, Roger Washington, Annie Kyles and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Washington v. Standholt et al
as 6:2007cv00470
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Standholt, FNU Badgett, FNU Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Treme et al v. H K A Enterprises Inc
as 6:2007cv01134
Plaintiff:
Shay Treme, Shay Treme, Tony Willrich and others
Defendant:
H K A Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
