Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Anderson v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anderson
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Bennett Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina-Rodriguez #957537 v. Frank et al
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
James William Medina-Rodriguez #957537
Defendant:
Unknown Frank, Unknown Peterson and Unknown Grossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10219
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Corrections, John Christiansen and others
Baney #219533 v. Parish et al
as 1:2020cv00992
Defendant:
Unknown Mayhew, Unknown Sisson, Les Parish and others
Plaintiff:
James William Baney #219533
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 4:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
James William Ward
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina-Rodriguez #957537 v. Sprader
as 2:2019cv00132
Respondent:
Scott Sprader
Petitioner:
James William Medina-Rodriguez #957537
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freese v. Horton
as 1:2019cv10967
Defendant:
Connie Horton
Plaintiff:
James William Freese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perrin Burse v. Norman Robinson, et al
as 17-3660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERRIN BURSE
Defendant - Appellee:
NORMAN ROBINSON, JAMES BALL, MICHAEL ALLEN EIRING and others
Thomas v. USA
as 6:2016cv00262
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James William Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Taylor v. Corrections Corporation of Ame, et al
as 13-5309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ALLEN, Educational Instructor, GRAY, Librarian and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
