Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Tristin D. King v. Jamar R. Williams
as 2:2020cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tristin D. King
Defendant:
James Williams and Jamar R. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Pat McTighe, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
James William Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Pat McTighe, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
James William Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2019cv01505
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Joe Lombardo and County of Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gates v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv01816
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General, Charles L Ryan and Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James William Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Department et al
as 2:2018cv02432
Defendant:
Shane Stephens, Chris Heim, Logan Jex and others
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Sciscento et al
as 2:2018cv02122
Defendant:
County of Clark, Joseph S. Sciscento and Sheriff Joe Lombardo
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sir Williams v. Kevin Doohan, et al
as 18-35644
Petitioner - Appellant:
SIR JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN DOOHAN, Parole Officer and MICHAEL WU, Chair Person Parole Board
Gates v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02351
Petitioner:
James William Gates
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. McTighe et al
as 2:2018cv00028
Petitioner:
James William Walker
Respondent:
Pat McTighe and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
