Cases 11 - 20 of 66
DADUS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05859
Plaintiff:
AUDIE DADUS , MAXINE DAVIS , THEODORA DELCO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: WILLIAMS
as 5:2013cv01743
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROWN et al v. PITTS et al
as 2:2012cv03547
Plaintiff:
MARCIA BROWN and JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN PITTS , JULIUS QUARTAPELLA , MICHAEL MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SILVERMAN et al
as 5:2012cv00974
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DANIEL SILVERMAN, L. CARRION and R. MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
BRENT BOYD, MARGENE ADKINS, FRED ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50863
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2011cv04681
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LEHIGH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLMAN v. WOOTEN et al
as 2:2011mc00078
Plaintiff:
ROSLYN HOLMAN
Defendant:
TERRY L. WOOTEN, THOMAS E. ROGERS, III, SHARI L. STEFANO and others
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03097
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64990
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS and LAURENE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
