Cases 11 - 20 of 82
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT et al
as 2:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT, PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv06188
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. MEALY
as 2:2015cv05049
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MEALY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Graff et al
as 1:2014cv01879
Plaintiff:
James William Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel H. Graff, David M. Whitcomb, Mark A. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00838
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM RANDALL, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
MOSES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06164
Plaintiff:
JERRY JAMES MOSES, JR. , TREVOR COBB , JERRY W. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC., NFL PROPERTIES, LLC, RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DADUS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05859
Plaintiff:
AUDIE DADUS , MAXINE DAVIS , THEODORA DELCO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01962
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
IN RE: WILLIAMS
as 5:2013cv01743
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Williams
as 1:2013mc00160
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
James Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
