Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bey v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jamil Malik Bey
Defendant:
Joe Biden and The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Henderson v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jamil P. Henderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Fowler v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2018cv00984
Plaintiff:
Donyea Fowler
Defendant:
Indiana State of, South Bend Police Department, Jamil Elwaer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD, et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02360
Plaintiff:
INTISAR JAMIL BALLARD and KEITH G. BALLARD
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Almashni v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jamil Mahmoud Almashni
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
James v. USA
as 2:2016cv00281
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jamil James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AHMAD EL v. TODD et al
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
JAMIL AHMAD EL
Defendant:
KEVIN S. PARKER, BROOKS R. THOMANN and WILLIAM ROBIN TODD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
