Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Basile v. The Los Angeles Film School, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Constantino Basile
Defendant:
The Los Angeles Film School, LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Scott Free Films, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor v. Orozco et al
as 1:2022cv11348
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
Judge Yolanda Orozco, Paul Marciano, Judge Linda Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Constantino Basile v. The Los Angeles Film School, et al
as 21-56266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTANTINO BASILE
Defendant / Appellee:
THE LOS ANGELES FILM SCHOOL, LLC, DBA The Los Angeles Film School, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, SCOTT FREE FILMS, LLC, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT-CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Constantino Basile v. The Los Angeles Film School, et al
as 20-56276
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT-CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, NANCY PELOSI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRIPKE ENTERPRISES, a California corporation, MITCHELL, SILBERBERG AND KNUPP, a California Corporation, BEVERLY HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTANTINO BASILE
John Doe v. Brixinvest LLC et al
as 2:2020cv08844
Defendant:
BRIXINVEST LLC, Brixinvest, LLC doing business as Rich Uncles, Does 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reyes v. JAMS, Inc. (JAMS) et al
as 4:2020cv00021
Plaintiff:
Felice P. Reyes
Defendant:
Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae, LLP, ADR Services, Inc. and JAMS, Inc. (JAMS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Constantino Basile v. The Los Angeles Film School, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv08604
Defendant:
Lana Wachowski, Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., Blake Lively and others
Plaintiff:
Constantino Basile
Petitioner:
City of Beverly Hills, a public entity, erroneously sued and served herein as Beverly Hills Police Department
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
In Re Subpoenas Issued to JAMS
as 17-2764
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Jane Doe
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
In re Subpoenas Issued to JAMS, Inc. and Carol A. Wittenberg
In Re Subpoenas Issued to JAMS
as 17-2764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe
Defendant / Appellee:
In re Subpoenas Issued to JAMS, Inc. and Carol A. Wittenberg
In re Subpoenas Issued to JAMS
as 17-2607
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Jane Doe
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
In re Subpoenas Issued to JAMS, Inc. and Carol A. Wittenberg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
