Cases 1 - 10 of 75
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
(PS) McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Kishor v. Stoller et al
as 2:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Chandra Kishor
Defendant:
John Stoller, Michael Bowman, Jan Scully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Scully
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tamecus Reed
Defendant:
Jan Scully
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxey v. Harris et al (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Samuel McCall, Jr., Santa Rosa Jr. College, Richard Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Donald Roots v. Robert Fox, et al
as 19-16991
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. FRAWLEY, Judge, JAN SCULLY, Prosecutory DA, CHU, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROOTS
(PC) Roots v. Fox et al
as 2:2018cv02458
Defendant:
Trina Burger Plaven, Gary Lutz, Classification and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Roots
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Scully et al
as 2:2017cv02372
Plaintiff:
David Henry Curry
Defendant:
Jan Scully, Sacramento Sheriff's Dept. (Carmichael), Jennifer Rauzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Schubert et al
as 2:2017cv00666
Plaintiff:
Othello C.M. Johnson
Defendant:
Anne Marie Schubert, Jan Scully, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Lewis v. Jan Scully, et al
as 17-15241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAN SCULLY, District Attorney, Sacramento County, TOM ASKER, District Attorney, JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
