Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Bey et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Akil R. Bey and Katina Bowers-Graves
Defendant:
Sharon Gregory Jacobs, Marilynn C. Goss, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Tonia A. Wheeler
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. , 7-Eleven Stores, Inc. , 7-Eleven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Warren, Jr. et al
as 4:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
D.W. Warren, Jr., Deputy M. Kingsley, Deputy Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hearn et al
as 3:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Percell Williams
Defendant:
Hearn, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Fain
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desouza et al v. First Mount Vernon ILA et al
as 1:2011cv00845
Plaintiff:
Dane Desouza and Veleska Desouza
Defendant:
First Mount Vernon ILA , FSB, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Day v. Milam et al
as 1:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tori Lakisha Day
Defendant:
Russell B. Milam , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rutledge v. Hooters of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Hooters of America, Inc., Hooters Restaurant, Shawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLendon v. United States Of America et al
as 7:2010cv00240
Defendant:
Mr. Frank Adair, All Employees at F.C.I. Beckley, WV, All Employees at F.C.I. Jessup and others
Plaintiff:
Juan P. McLendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Keith v. Mogel et al
as 1:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
Curtis M. Keith
Defendant:
Mogel, Emron, Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
