Cases 1 - 10 of 22
OUTMemphis et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv02670
Plaintiff:
OUTMemphis, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jonathan Skrmetti, David Rausch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burger v. Polk County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jillian Burger
Defendant:
Polk County, Tennessee, Mark Von Roden, Stacy Weed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bivens v. Polk County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bivens
Defendant:
Polk County, Tennessee, Jane Doe #3, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Jennifer Williams, Arvil Chapman, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Watson et al
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cox
Defendant:
Eric Watson, John Beavers, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey et al v. Knox County Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bailey and Tina Bailey
Defendant:
Knox County Tennessee, Knox County Sheriff's Office, J. J. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv01083
Plaintiff:
Winfred Wright
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Matthews, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Carl Hamilton
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuot v. John Doe Medical Contractor et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Gai Kuot
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Damon Hininger, President of C.C.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
