Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Leed et al v. Pitney et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Cody Leed, Kimberlie Mollette and Aiden Manges
Defendant:
Matthew Pitney, Matthew Hassell, Marshall County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE 4 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDS v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. The Geo Group et al
as 3:2020cv00952
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana, Moore, Mr Newkirk and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Danny R Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv02457
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. WEXFORD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
BARNS DOE, BRAD DOE, COLLINS DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Dallas et al
as 3:2014cv01603
Plaintiff:
John G. Young
Defendant:
John Dallas, Mitchell E Daniels, Jr, Michael Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. DALLAS et al
as 1:2013cv00731
Defendant:
MS ANGEL, EDDIE BUSS, DR COCKERELL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
