Cases 41 - 50 of 588
Norman v. Jane Doe/John Doe
as 1:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Norman
Defendant:
Jane Doe/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogun v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Oluwasegun Ogun
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Brown et al v. Does et al
as 1:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Kane Brown, Everybody Eats LLC and Family, LLC
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does and ABC Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Godfrey v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Rodetrick Lamont Godfrey
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jane Doe, Albert Vanderpool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Cabell et al
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Shawn Martin
Defendant:
Beth Cabell, Martin Byrant, Terra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank and The General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Queen v. Huiandy et al
as 7:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Demond M. Queen
Defendant:
Lisa Huiandy, Rick White, Eric Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Draper v. Ohai et al
as 7:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
John Gregory Draper
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Ohai, Nurse Practitioner Mark Berry, Nurse Wanda Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyne v. Sponheimer et al
as 1:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Paul Boyne
Defendant:
Michael Sponheimer, Samantha McCord and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
