Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gary v. The People of the State of Maryland and Baltimore Cty et al
as 1:2019cv01348
Petitioner:
Kevin Wayne Gary
Respondent:
The People of the State of Maryland and Baltimore Cty, Jane Doe 1-10, David E. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lisi v. The People of the State of New York and Suffolk County et al
as 2:2018cv06375
Petitioner:
Brandon Lisi
Respondent:
"John Doe" 1-10, Timothy D. Sini, The People of the State of New York and Suffolk County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Ige et al
as 1:2018cv00034
Petitioner:
William Jackson Gay Barnes
Respondent:
Ige, Nolan Espinda, Francis Sequiera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tate, Sean v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Sean Tate
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Chapa et al
as 3:2013cv00387
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa and John and Jane Does 1-10
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PIROLLO v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv03034
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE PIROLLO
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GATTO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv02877
Petitioner:
JOHN A. GATTO
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2007cv05859
Petitioner:
RAVANNA S. BEY
Respondent:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ERIC TAYLOR, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
