Cases 41 - 50 of 95
SAMARCO et al v. COOK et al
as 2:2019cv04086
Plaintiff:
LORI SAMARCO and JOSEPH SAMARCO
Defendant:
AUSTIN COOK and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv02298
Defendant:
JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10, SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
KHADEEJAH EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ et al v. BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00827
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN LOPEZ and SONIA LOPEZ
Defendant:
BRENNTAG NORTHEAST, LLC, ABC CORPORATIONS (A-Z), BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VELEZ v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2019cv00162
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and OFFICER SCOTT SCHWEIZER
Plaintiff:
JOSE VELEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEIGEL v. ARIA HEALTH
as 2:2018cv05550
Defendant:
ARIA HEALTH, XYZ CORPS. 1-10 and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-10)
Plaintiff:
CARLTON SEIGEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2018cv05403
Defendant:
OFFICER SCOTT SCHWEIZER, OFFICER SZELAGOWSKI, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ v. CZAPOR et al
as 2:2018cv05402
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and OFFICER JONATHAN CZAPOR
Plaintiff:
FRANSICO GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS v. PERON et al
as 5:2018cv01824
Plaintiff:
ALBERT NORRIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM PERON, FLAG NOR FAIL, INC., SPEED WARHOUSE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
