Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BRANDT v. HUDSON COUNTY, THOMAS DEGISE et al
as 2:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY, THOMAS DEGISE, ERICA GALE, RYANNA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLAFANA v. BORETZ et al
as 2:2022cv06549
Plaintiff:
YASIN VILLAFANA
Defendant:
STACY BORITV, LAUREN BAYER, REGINA CAULFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDT v. CIRILLO et al
as 2:2022cv03752
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
GUY CIRILLO, TONY BROWN, ANTONIO PIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDT v. OFFICER MORGAN et al
as 2:2022cv03379
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
OFFICER MORGAN, NURSE ALEXIS, ALFARO ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frith v. Barnett Outdoors, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Barnett Outdoors, LLC doing business as Barnett Crossbows and John and Jane Does 1-19
Plaintiff:
Colton Frith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaikov v. Kaikov et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
SHIRYAK, BOWMAN, ANDERSON, GILL & KADOCHNIKOV LLP, ROYAL A&K REALTY GROUP INC., AG REALTY BRONX CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
CHALAMO KAIKOV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BRANDT v. THURING et al
as 3:2016cv08792
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
ROBERT THURING, CHRIS WILLIAMS, CRISTIAN ZEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYLER v. CRUZ et al
as 3:2015cv02951
Plaintiff:
MACK TYLER
Defendant:
JACQUELINE CRUZ, LAWRENCE ROSSI, LEE ACUFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Does 1-19 v. Sesi
as 2:2014cv14698
Plaintiff:
Jane Does 1-19
Defendant:
Masoud H Sesi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
WHITE v. SANCHOMORA et al
as 3:2013cv02492
Plaintiff:
HORACE WHITE
Defendant:
ELDA SANCHOMORA, GIOVANNI PERRILI, JEFFREY GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
