Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1480
Plaintiff: MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant: JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity
Interested Party: RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. Conservation Law Foundation, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff: MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Appellant: CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Interested Party: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Wild Fish Conservancy et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv05296
Plaintiff: Wild Fish Conservancy and Wild Salmon Rivers d/b/a The Conservation Angler
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 24-5071
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and Conservation Law Foundation, 18-cv-00283-JEB
Defendant: Gina M. Raimondo, Secretary of the Department of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator of NOAA Fisheries
Intervenor: Maine Lobstermen's Association, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, State of Maine and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff: MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant: RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party: CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff: COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORRO, THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE, CRAIG RUCKER and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF OCEAN MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Raymond Lofstad, et al v. Secretary United States Department of Commerce, et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff: RAYMOND LOFSTAD and GUS LOVGREN
Defendant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, JANET COIT, in her official capacity as AssistantAdministrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) et al
as 1:2024cv10332
Plaintiff: Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc.
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Gina Raimondo and Janet Coit
Amicus Curiae: Pro Se Party Richard Strahan, Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Arnesen v. Raimondo
as 24-60055
Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc., William Copeland and others
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, NMFS Assistant Administrator and others
Amicus Curiae: Cato Institute
STAVOLA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff: THOMAS STAVOLA, JR
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?