Cases 1 - 10 of 51
United Cook Inlet Drift Association et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Defendant:
Jon Kurland, Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Plaintiff:
United Cook Inlet Drift Association and Cook Inlet Fishermen's Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Russo et al v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Dominick Russo, James Russo and FFC Seafood, Inc.
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, Janet Coit and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Committee for Constructive Tomorrow, et al v. Department of Interior, et al
as 24-5151
Plaintiff:
Committee for Constructive Tomorrow, Heartland Institute, a non-profit corporation, Craig Rucker, an individual and others
Defendant:
Department of Interior, Debra A. Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, acting in her official capacity, United States Bureau of Ocean Management and others
United Cook Inlet Drift Association et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
United Cook Inlet Drift Association and Cook Inlet Fishermen's Fund
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gina Raimondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1480
Defendant:
GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, in her official capacity, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Interested Party:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc. v. Conservation Law Foundation, et al
as 24-1481
Defendant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, in her official capacity and others
Interested Party:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Wild Fish Conservancy et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv05296
Plaintiff:
Wild Fish Conservancy, Wild Salmon Rivers d/b/a The Conservation Angler and Wild Salmon Rivers doing business as The Conservation Angler
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 24-5071
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and Conservation Law Foundation, 18-cv-00283-JEB
Defendant:
Gina M. Raimondo, Secretary of the Department of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator of NOAA Fisheries
Intervenor:
Maine Lobstermen's Association, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, State of Maine and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. Strahan
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORRO, THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE, CRAIG RUCKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF OCEAN MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
