Cases 41 - 50 of 89
New Beginnings Ministries et al v. George et al
as 2:2015cv02781
Plaintiff:
New Beginnings Ministries , William Dunfee , Connie Dunfee and others
Defendant:
Thomas George, Tina Ransom, J.D. Kirkpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glenn Warne et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Glenn Warne , Catherine Warne , Darrel Pelfrey and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Williams
as 2:2014cv14199
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Janine Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01711
Plaintiff:
Janine Larie Murphy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kitchen v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv12883
Plaintiff:
Michael Kitchen
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, George Stephenson, Steece and others
Daniel Bergeron, et al v. Robert Cole, et al
as 14-1793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DWAYNE BERGERON and ANTONETTA K. BERGONE
Defendant:
JANINE FERGERSON, LLOYD FAYLING and MARCIE SEYFRIED
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT COLE and DANIEL ALLEN
Doran v. Doran et al
as 2:2014cv12263
Plaintiff:
Anthony Doran
Defendant:
Deborah S Doran, Janine Spencer, Timothy Spencer and others
Slocum et al v. City of Cleveland Heights et al
as 1:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
Byou Bar & Grill LLC , Tonie Slocum and Shannon Slocum
Defendant:
City of Cleveland Heights , Tanisha R. Briley , Jeffrey Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruse v. Senanayake et al
as 2:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Wendell L. Cruse
Defendant:
Janine Senanayake, Walter Davis and Derrick Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
