Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04118
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01711
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jaramillo v. ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2026cv05017
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Jaramillo
Defendant:
ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12660
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
US v. Galvin
as 26-1657
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
WILLIAM F. GALVIN, in the official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MASSACHUSETTS ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, COMMON CAUSE and others
Interested Party:
FORMER EMPLOYEES OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BIPARTISAN AMERICAN ELECTION PROJECT and DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
US v. Alejandro Garcia
as 26-4305
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO JARAMILLO GARCIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01867
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jaramillo v. United Pipe & Supply Co.
as 1:2026cv02478
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jaramillo
Defendant:
United Pipe and Supply Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.