Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
E-Myth Worldwide, Inc. v. Harris
as 3:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
E-Myth Worldwide, Inc., Michael E. Gerber Companies, Inc., Radical U, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mark Jason Harris, Mary K. Bacher, Business Advisors 360, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 112
Vicky Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster, Karen Frye and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Farson v. City of Lake Stevens et al
as 2:2022cv00405
Defendant:
Neil Wells, City of Lake Stevens, Lake Stevens Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
David Merritt Farson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Isler v. Ketchikan Correctional et al
as 5:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Ketchikan Correctional and Jason Harris
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Bradley Isler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barracliffe v. Fortney et al
as 2:2020cv01024
Defendant:
Adam Fortney, Arthur Wallin, Jack Yilmaz and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Barracliffe II and Paul Barracliffe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States
as 1:2017cv01683
Plaintiff:
Jason Harris
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin King v. Jerome Price, et al
as 16-17335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LYNELL KING
Defendant - Appellee:
JEROME PRICE, Warden, JASON PRICE, D. CREACH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
